Jonathan Mridha vs Christopher Li Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 07:15 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Mridha vs C. Li

SWE
0
Win
Played
1
Win

PER
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Mridha 0 - 1 Li
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jonathan Mridha winning 0 and Christopher Li winning 2. The last match between Christopher Li and Jonathan Mridha was at the M15 Orlando, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Christopher Li getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mridha | 0 |
| Li | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Orlando(11-05-25)
J. Mridha vs C. Li H2H Profile
J. Mridha vs C. Li Match Preview:
- Which player has the edge on second serve points? Jonathan Mridha has a slight advantage, winning 45.44% compared to Christopher Li's 44.22%.
- In terms of returning the opponent’s second serve, Christopher Li excels with a higher success rate of 48.00% against Mridha's 45.86%.
- Both players have similar capabilities in returning first serves, with Mridha at 27.61% and Li following close behind at 27.44%.
- Which player handles pressure better during break points? Christopher Li narrowly outperforms Mridha, saving 57.69% of break points compared to Mridha's 57.47%.
- Looking broadly at match successes over the past year, Li has a better win rate, triumphing in 56.25% of matches as opposed to Mridha’s 40.91%.
- On which surface does each player perform best? Mridha shines on Hard surfaces with a 59% win rate, whereas Li excels on Indoor Hard surfaces with the same percentage.
- When comparing tournament levels, Christopher Li has a higher success in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, winning 64.29% of his matches, over Mridha's 40.91%.
- Is opponent strength a significant factor? Li has consistently played against slightly lesser-ranked players, averaging a rank of 411.69 compared to Mridha's 406.86.
- In deciding sets, Li has the upper hand, clinching 67% of these situations, whereas Mridha has only won 33% in the last year.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
As these two players prepare to face off, several key performance indicators point to Christopher Li having a notable advantage. Although Mridha slightly edges him in second serve point success, Li's overall return game appears stronger, particularly against second serves, where he boasts a higher win percentage.
Both competitors exhibit similar proficiency in handling first serve returns and managing high-pressure break point situations. However, Li's superior deciding set performance could be crucial if the match goes the distance.
While Mridha's best matches are played on Hard surfaces, Li’s success on Indoor Hard surfaces and his better recent track record in $10K events positions him favorably. Taking into account all these factors, Christopher Li is the likely favorite to win the upcoming encounter.
Jonathan Mridha vs Christopher Li Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Mridha vs C. Li H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:50:7 | Average Match Time | 1:50:7 |
| 69% (51/74) | 1st Serve % | 65% (37/57) |
| 47% (24/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (23/37) |
| 43% (10/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (11/20) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 46% (6/13) |
| 40% (23/57) | Return Points Win % | 54% (40/74) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Mridha Recent Matches Played
C. Li Recent Matches Played

J. Mridha vs C. Li Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.78% (275/218) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.16% (14/17) |
| 55.03% (613/501) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.95% (35/38) |
| 52.42% (5465/4960) | Games Win/Loss | 51.56% (331/311) |
| 59.05% (62/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 56.83% (154/117) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (9/12) |
| 50.43% (59/58) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1218 | Aces Total | 47 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 885 | Total Double Faults | 98 |
| 1:14:20 | Average Match Time | 1:31:9 |
| 525.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 527.45 |
| 62% (14897/24039) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1063/1712) |
| 68% (10147/14897) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (656/1063) |
| 50% (4598/9142) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (298/649) |
| 43% (1040/2436) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (87/201) |
| 41% (9739/23985) | Return Points Win % | 42% (712/1691) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.75% (21/27) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 58.10% (251/181) | Futures W/L | 51.85% (14/13) |
| 56% (269/477) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (14/31) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (70/138) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 52% (68/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 88% (258/226) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (18/12) |
| 12% (258/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (18/6) |
| 21% (234/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (13/2) |